Blog | Resources
Imposter Syndrome at Work: Is It Real?
Part 3: Imposter Syndrome at Work: Why It Shows Up and What Actually Helps
Personal development is often associated with building confidence, yet even where confidence appears to be present, a different experience can sit just beneath the surface. It is possible to be performing well, meeting expectations, and progressing in a role, while still questioning whether that position has been fully earned.
This raises an important question: is imposter syndrome real, or is it simply a label we have come to use for a more complex experience?
The experience commonly described as imposter syndrome sits closely alongside conversations about confidence, self-belief and belonging. While the term is widely used, it is not always the most helpful way to understand what is happening in practice. For many people, the more useful starting point is to explore what sits beneath those feelings, what reinforces them, and what helps people move forward with greater clarity and self-trust.
This article forms part of the Personal Development in Practice Series, which explores how meaningful development happens across four connected areas: self-understanding, context, action, and sustainability. Each piece looks beyond the surface of familiar topics to understand what is shaping behaviour in practice, and how that can be approached more effectively.
Looking beyond the IMposter Syndrome label
Imposter syndrome is typically described as the feeling of being a fraud, or the belief that success is due to luck rather than capability. While this captures the experience at a surface level, the language itself carries certain implications.
The word “syndrome” suggests something internal, fixed, and individual. It implies that the experience sits within the person and, by extension, that it is something that needs to be corrected or resolved. In many cases, this framing can be limiting.
An alternative way of understanding this experience is through the term imposter phenomenon, which is increasingly used in research and practice. This framing shifts the focus. Rather than positioning the experience as a personal deficit, it recognises it as a response to a set of conditions, including expectations, transitions, visibility, and environment.
This distinction is subtle but important. It moves the conversation away from asking what is wrong, towards understanding what is influencing the response in the first place.
What tends to sit beHIND Imposter PhenomenoN
When explored more closely, several factors commonly contribute to this experience.
Comparison plays a significant role. Workplaces often provide limited visibility into how others are navigating their roles, which can lead to assumptions that others are more prepared or more certain than they actually are. This creates a distorted reference point against which individuals assess themselves.
Representation and belonging can also influence how secure someone feels in their position. Where individuals do not see others with similar backgrounds or experiences reflected around them, it can affect how natural it feels to occupy that space, even when they are fully capable of doing so.
Expectations and transitions are another factor. Moving into a new role, taking on greater responsibility, or being exposed to more senior conversations can create a temporary gap between capability and confidence. During these periods, questioning one’s readiness can be a natural part of adjustment rather than an indication of being unprepared.
There is also an element of how success is interpreted. Where achievements are attributed externally, to timing, support, or circumstance, it becomes more difficult to internalise capability. Over time, this can reinforce a sense that success is not fully owned.
These patterns are widely recognised. Research has highlighted that a large proportion of professionals report experiencing these feelings at different stages of their careers, often at points of progression rather than at the start. This reinforces the idea that imposter experiences are not a sign of being out of place, but a common response to growth and change.
The four pillars of meaningful personal development
A more practical way to understand personal development is to view it as a combination of four connected elements.
Self-understanding is where development begins. It involves recognising your values, strengths, patterns, and beliefs. Without this foundation, change often becomes reactive and shaped by external pressures rather than internal clarity.
Context recognises that development does not happen in isolation. Workplace culture, expectations, support systems, and lived experiences shape what feels possible. Confidence, for example, is influenced not only by the individual, but by how safe, supported, or recognised they feel.
Action is where insight becomes meaningful. Reflection alone does not create change. Development takes shape when awareness translates into behaviour, whether through conversations, decisions, or small shifts in how situations are approached.
Sustainability ensures that change lasts. Meaningful development emerges over time through reflection, practice, and reinforcement. It is rarely the result of a single moment of motivation, but rather a series of consistent, intentional actions.
Together, these elements provide a more complete and realistic picture of how development happens.
Understanding where Confidence sits within development
This is where self-understanding becomes particularly relevant.
If these experiences are framed as a syndrome, the focus tends to remain on the feeling itself, and how to reduce or remove it. When they are understood as a phenomenon, attention shifts to what is influencing that response. This creates a more constructive way to engage with the experience.
It also brings context into view. The environments people operate in, the expectations they navigate, and the visibility they are given all shape how secure they feel in their role. Development becomes less about correcting internal doubt and more about understanding how different factors are interacting in practice.
How Imposter Phenomenon shows up in everyday work
In practice, this experience can take a number of forms.
An individual may prepare extensively for meetings or presentations, not because they lack knowledge, but because they want to avoid the possibility of being exposed as unprepared. Another may hesitate to contribute unless they are certain their input is fully formed, which can limit participation in more exploratory discussions.
It can also influence how opportunities are approached. Even when encouraged to step forward, individuals may question whether they are ready, or whether someone else would be a more appropriate choice.
These responses are often interpreted as a lack of confidence. In reality, they reflect how individuals are making sense of their environment, their expectations, and their own progress.
A more practical Approach to tackling feeling like an imposter
One way to approach this more constructively is to separate perception from evidence.
When a thought such as “I am not ready for this” arises, it can be useful to examine what that belief is based on, and how it compares to the evidence available. This does not remove the feeling, but it can provide a more balanced perspective.
A simple way to explore this is through a short reflection:
- What am I telling myself about this situation?
- What evidence supports that view?
- What evidence suggests a different perspective?
- How would I view someone else in the same position?
This exercise is not intended to dismiss uncertainty, but to bring greater clarity to how conclusions are being formed. Over time, this can help to create a more grounded view of capability.
Rather than trying to remove these experiences entirely, a more effective approach is to understand and work alongside them.
Recognising that these responses often accompany progression can change how they are interpreted. Instead of signalling that something is wrong, they can indicate that an individual is operating at the edge of their current experience, which is where development tends to occur.
Creating space for open conversation can also be valuable. When individuals share similar experiences, it becomes clear that these responses are not isolated, which can reduce the sense of being uniquely affected.
Finally, linking experience back to evidence, through feedback, outcomes, and contribution, helps to reinforce a more accurate view of capability over time.
Where this leads next
Experiences such as confidence and self-doubt are often closely linked to a broader question of direction.
Even where capability is clear, it is possible to feel uncertain about what comes next, or whether current work aligns with what matters most. This is where the conversation begins to shift from internal experience to a wider sense of clarity and purpose.
In the next article, we explore why people often feel stuck in their careers, even when they are progressing, and how a clearer understanding of values and direction can create a more meaningful sense of movement.
Final thoughts
So, is imposter syndrome really real? The experience certainly is. Many people do question their capability, doubt whether they belong, or worry that their achievements are not fully deserved, even when there is evidence to the contrary.
The question is whether “syndrome” is always the most helpful way to describe it.
Framing it as a phenomenon provides a more balanced perspective. It acknowledges the experience without placing the focus solely on the individual. It also creates space to consider the wider conditions that shape how people interpret their own capability, including workplace culture, expectations, transitions, feedback, representation and support.
As with many aspects of personal development, the goal is not to eliminate uncertainty entirely. A more useful aim is to help people understand what sits beneath those feelings, respond with greater self-trust, and take intentional action in the situations where doubt might otherwise hold them back.








